Top 3 Salespersons Ranking by Monthly Sales Amount R language VS esProc
Both R language and esProc have the outstanding ability to perform the stepwise computations. However, in the particulars they differ from each other. A comparison between them will be done by the following example:
A company’s Sales department wants to select out the outstanding salespersons through statistics, that is, the salespersons whose sales amounts are always among the top 3 in each month from the January this year to the previous year. The data is mainly from the order table of MSSQL database: salesOrder, and the main fields include the ID of order: ordered, name of salesperson: name, sales amount: sales, and date of order: salesDate.
The solution is like this substantially:
Compute the beginning dates of this year and this month, and filter the data by date.
Group by month and salesperson, and compute the sales amount of each salesperson in each month.
Group by month, and compute the rankings of sales amount in each group.
Filter out the top 3 salespersons from each group.
Compute the set of intersections of each group, that is, salespersons always among the top 3 in each month.
The solution of R language is as shown below:
04 originalData<-sqlQuery(conn,’select * from salesOrder’)
Firstly, filter by date, group by month and sales person and then summarize by sales amount. The above functionalities are implemented respectively in line 8-9 for R language and cell A3-A4 for esProc. The difference is not great.
Proceed with the computation. According to the a bit straightforward thought of analysis, the steps followed should be: 1 Group by month; 2 Add the field of ranking in the group, and compute the rankings; 3 Filter by ranking, and only keep the salespersons that achieved the sales amounts ranking the top 3 in each group; 4. Finally, compute the set of intersection on the basis of the data in each group.
The corresponding codes of R language are from line 10 – 14 in the order of 2->3->1->4. In order words, rank the data in each group throughout the whole table, and then group. Have you noticed anything awkward? Although it is the ranking within the group, users of R language have to sort first and then group! This is because R language is weak in the ability to group first and then process. To barely compose the statements following the train of thought of 1->2->3->4, users of R language must have a strong technical background to handle the complex iteration statement expressions. The style of reverse thinking on this condition will greatly simplify the codes.
esProc solution completes the similar computation in the cell A5 – A8, not requiring any reverse thought. esProc users can simply follow their intuitive thinking of 1->2->3->4. This is because that esProc provides the ingenious representing style of ~. The ~ represents the current member that takes part in the computation. For this case, the ~ is each 2-dimension table in the group (corresponds to the data.frame of R language or the resutSet of SQL). In this way, ~.monthSales can be used to represent a certain column of the current 2-dimension table. By compassion, users of R language can only resort to some rather complicated means like loops to access the current member, which is more troublesome for sure.
With regard to this comparison, esProc is more intuitive with relatively more advantageous.
Next, let’s study on their abilities in computing the intermediate results.
R language allows users to view the result of each step by clicking the variable name at any time, with RStudio and other tools.
esProc provides only one official tool, that is, click the cell to view the result of this step.
Regarding this ability, esProc does not differ from R language much. Considering that R language supports for a great many of 3rd party tools, maybe there is any tool capable of providing the better observed results.
Then, let compare their abilities to reference the result.
R language users are only required to define a variable for the result of computation in each step to conveniently reference the result in the steps followed with regard to the R language solution.
esProc users can also define variables to reference, however, using the cell name as the variable name is more convenient and saves the trouble of finding a meaningful name.
Next, let’s compare their performances on set of intersection.
In the last step, the intersection set of data of every group are to be computed. R language provides the intersect function at the bottom layer, using together with Reducefunction, the intersection set of multiple groups of data can be computed.
esProc provides isect function to compute the set of intersection on multiple sets, which is quite convenient.
Comparatively, R language provides the Reduce function of greater imaginary space, and esProc is easier.
As it can be seen from the above case, R language boasts the abundant fundamental functions and a huge amount of library functions from the 3rd party.
In respect of data member access, esProc provides the excellent representing style, in particular the grouping at multi-levels. By comparison, R language relies more on the loop statements.
Both esProc and R language solutions have excellent performances in respect of interaction.